Nothing is certain with prospects, but they have a lot of them and Gimenez can play 2nd or SS so they also have flexibility for the position of the replacement too.The question is in the word 'likely', quoted above.
Yeah IMO Curry wasn't sent to AAA so he could be stretched out as a starter, he was sent to AAA for being inferior to Gaddis who earned the spot with the big club, and with that role in the big club came the spot starter / #6 starter role.mopete12 said:
Gaddis is stretched out to 70 pitches right now. Doubt Curry is much more stretched out.
Ahem
It’s a general observation from being a reader of the board. You have a camp that thinks Amed is best for the team this year and beyond. and you have another camp that doesn’t, and in the argument it appears to me that they see the need to diminish what Amed provides, in order to make the point that someone else would be better. Which I don’t think is necessary.I must have missed something. Who has denigrated Amed?
I assume a lot had Andres. Hopefully that deal buys out at least one year of FASo.. who had Stephan and Gimenez as the two Guardians being extended in the pool?..
A bit surprised on Stephan. Middle relief pitchers can go "poof" pretty unexpectedly. Interested to see how long they went with him and for how much per year.So.. who had Stephan and Gimenez as the two Guardians being extended in the pool?..
It makes sense. Someone who has gone through the ups and downs he has, and not that long ago either with the Rule 5 draft, is probably going to value some security vs the risk of waiting to milk every dollar out of Arbor eventual FAI think @Tondo had Stephan actually.
Maybe a 3rd extension???
Oh hell yes