• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

23 GM Thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
One thing I think that both @CDAV45 @CATS44 and @Out of the Rafters at the Q will agree on, is that Cleveland needs to clean out their pipes better. We lost 2 relievers to the Rule 5 draft, and perhaps more critically given what we've been seeing so far, we lost the chance to sign Luke Maile for about $2 MM give or take.

At some point we have to be satisfied with garage sale prices on both prospects AND guys like Rosario just to clear out the 40 man.

Whether you are thinking short term or long term or medium term or value contact or power, it feels like unless we feel like we're ripping off a team the FO just sits on their hands and doesn't make moves.

Sure, Benson, Vargas, and Miller were a start but we could've went a lot further...

Even the Jones trade was 40-man neutral.
I do agree. We don't even need to discuss what they should target in return. They are extremely cautious to the point of appearing scared at times. That's not the way I'm built or operate. Make a decision, see it through and reap the benefits or accept the consequences and learn.

Benson, Vargas and Miller were never going to return much if we're being honest so I don't mind holding onto them a bit longer. The ones that irk me are keeping Amed while knowing they weren't going to extend him. I'm pretty sure they never made an official offer although they may have made some courtesy calls. I'm also pretty sure that they don't see 2023 and 2024 as contention years so why in the hell wouldn't they get a huge haul for Bieber? That's the ML portion of my angst.

While CATS and I don't see eye to eye on many things I don't think he's wrong when he points out that they've hung onto prospects too long. I'll give you an example. We have all of Gimenez, Arias, Rocchio and Freeman to sort through. Don't you think they would choose 2 of those and roll with them? Instead, what they've done to this point is either entrench them in AAA or restrict them to limited ML play in the name of Amed Rosario. I just don't think that's the right way to go about it.

I would add that they need to be more aggressive in the first round of the draft too. Enough of drafting someone that will sign under slot so they can offer more to someone in the 2nd round. Get the best available player with the highest pick and quit trying to be overly witty. That's how we ended up with Benson, Zimmer, Naquin and others. When we got our guy like Lindor and Frazier we either ended up with a franchise player or someone that had real value in a trade.
 
Bieber, Cantillo, Karinchak, Rosario to the D'backs.
For Corbin Carrol.

That probably makes Arizona division favorites.
Solves 2 problems for us.
 
Bieber, Cantillo, Karinchak, Rosario to the D'backs.
For Corbin Carrol.

That probably makes Arizona division favorites.
Solves 2 problems for us.

We can get way more talent than that for Bieber though...
 
What kind of team would be really interested in acquiring Bieber for one year?

A contender.

Why would they want to do that?

To vastly improve their chances to win immediately.

In that situation, what would they be willing to trade away?

Prospects, not core pieces of their offense. Trading away elite offensive cornerstones for an elite pitcher would merely be robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Trading Bieber will not solve immediate offensive problems.

*******

Conversely, what kind of team would be willing to trade away an elite hitter?

A team in rebuild.

What would they want in return?

A long term influx of young talent, meaning prospects.

If you want to acquire a significant upgrade in offense, it will require trading away significant prospects.

Over the years we have traded away multiple FORs with little team control remaining. How many established offensive upgrades have we recieved in return combined for CC, Lee, Bartolo, Bauer, Clevinger, and Kluber?

Not one.

******

On the very rare occasions in which this FO has traded significant prospect capital for significant MLB upgrades, how many of those prospects ever became significant MLB players?

Not one.

Honestly I figured I would reply to this here...

Cleveland, if they play their cards right, could on paper, have a very similar team talent wise if not better than they currently do by trading Bieber then trading for someone to replace Bieber in a sense. So Bieber gets the bat they need and the prospects we have gets someone to help replace Bieber in a sense and/or compliments this roster...

@Gson @CDAV45 @hockeyjohn @CATS44 humor me a moment and whoever else wants to do this I have a challenge... I will be doing it as well so don't worry

With 3 or less trades (you can say DFA so and so, that wont be considered a trade)... Let's say Antonetti makes Bieber available but still wishes for a wild card spot at least! He is willing to part with prospects as well to find upgrades in struggling positions...

At the end, Cleveland needs at least 3 SPs with 2+ years of MLB experience... design the trades within realistic reason (Aka BTV as a guiding point of reference if need be) and let's see what you come up with and we can discuss the trade ideas. We all won't agree but I think the middle ground could be interesting...
 
Honestly I figured I would reply to this here...

Cleveland, if they play their cards right, could on paper, have a very similar team talent wise if not better than they currently do by trading Bieber then trading for someone to replace Bieber in a sense. So Bieber gets the bat they need and the prospects we have gets someone to help replace Bieber in a sense and/or compliments this roster...

@Gson @CDAV45 @hockeyjohn @CATS44 humor me a moment and whoever else wants to do this I have a challenge... I will be doing it as well so don't worry

With 3 or less trades (you can say DFA so and so, that wont be considered a trade)... Let's say Antonetti makes Bieber available but still wishes for a wild card spot at least! He is willing to part with prospects as well to find upgrades in struggling positions...

At the end, Cleveland needs at least 3 SPs with 2+ years of MLB experience... design the trades within realistic reason (Aka BTV as a guiding point of reference if need be) and let's see what you come up with and we can discuss the trade ideas. We all won't agree but I think the middle ground could be interesting...
Well first thing I would do is trade for Rich Hill and put him in the bullpen.

Since Hill is currently the oldest player in MLB, his veteran presence should be unmatched and we'll have the best bullpen in baseball.
 
Well first thing I would do is trade for Rich Hill and put him in the bullpen.

Since Hill is currently the oldest player in MLB, his veteran presence should be unmatched and we'll have the best bullpen in baseball.

I mean we had him in our bullpen before. We help rebuild.his career, so he wouldn't be against coming back and helping some youngsters build theirs!
 
Bieber, Cantillo, Karinchak, Rosario to the D'backs.
For Corbin Carrol.

That probably makes Arizona division favorites.
Solves 2 problems for us.
Love ya Mott, but hell no.
 
Honestly I figured I would reply to this here...

Cleveland, if they play their cards right, could on paper, have a very similar team talent wise if not better than they currently do by trading Bieber then trading for someone to replace Bieber in a sense. So Bieber gets the bat they need and the prospects we have gets someone to help replace Bieber in a sense and/or compliments this roster...

@Gson @CDAV45 @hockeyjohn @CATS44 humor me a moment and whoever else wants to do this I have a challenge... I will be doing it as well so don't worry

With 3 or less trades (you can say DFA so and so, that wont be considered a trade)... Let's say Antonetti makes Bieber available but still wishes for a wild card spot at least! He is willing to part with prospects as well to find upgrades in struggling positions...

At the end, Cleveland needs at least 3 SPs with 2+ years of MLB experience... design the trades within realistic reason (Aka BTV as a guiding point of reference if need be) and let's see what you come up with and we can discuss the trade ideas. We all won't agree but I think the middle ground could be interesting...
Whatever happens this is the core I'm building around:
Rotation- TMac, Bibee, Williams, Cantillo, Morris and Allen. I would be open to dealing Allen in the right situation. Morris' value isn't where it needs to be to deal him, but if a return from a bigger trade would be enhanced by including him I would consider it.
Positions- Kwan(CF), JRam(3B), J Naylor(1B), B Naylor(C), Gimenez(2B or SS), one of Arias, Rocchio or Freeman to play opposite of Gimenez.

Straw would be more useful/productive as our 4th OFer......maybe. He's garbage with the bat, but he plays fantastic defense and runs the bases about as good as anybody. That screams 4th OFer. I'm moving Kwan back to CF.

After that, we need to see what some of these talented kids can do. Arias is coming around with the bat and Freeman deserves to be playing. I don't care if you keep Arias as the utility, move Gimenez to SS and give Freeman the 2B job or if Arias is the SS with Gimenez remaining at 2B and freeman coming off the bench. Maybe Rocchio takes the job away from both. There just aren't enough opportunities to go around right now.

Bo needs to be our starting C to get him ML experience at the least and he will be at some point. The chances are very good IMO that he improves this team when he takes over C duties.

You have to add Collins to the 40 man and give him a look, even if only briefly. You can't ignore what he's doing and there is no split issue with him whatsoever this season. He can share DH/1B duties if he continues to rake. If he doesn't then designating him is no big deal.

Once McKenzie, Civale and Morris return that brings us to dealing some SP. There are a few teams that will be interested in Bieber for sure. Namely the Dodgers, Orioles, Angels and Cardinals. I'd have to have a SP or ready SP prospect in return to start with and build from there. I'd target Bradish, Stone, Nastrini, Pepiot, Liberatore, Bachman, Bush and Graceffo from a SP perspective. Positionally I'd look at Hays, Ward, Yepez, Westburg, Vargas, Fabian and DeLuca. The loser of the Bieber sweepstakes could have interest in either Quantrill and/or Civale. Obviously it will be a lesser package, but they would still garner a good return.

I'm also willing to include or listening to offers on one of Freeman, Arias and Rocchio. I'd be willing to deal any/all of OGon, Valera and Brennan. I'm not looking to give them away so the return has to be satisfactory.

There are also some more minor deals that could possibly be made for guys like Meneses and Rooker(if you believe what he's doing is sustainable). A deal where Brennan goes to Oakland for Rooker sounds reasonable. Even if you had to add someone like Gaddis I'd still consider it and I'd definitely send Brennan and Gaddis to Washington for Meneses.

Clearly being aggressive like this would require they cut ties and eat some salary unless they could get teams to take on those salaries.
 
2 of Bieber, Civale, Quantrill and Plesac will be kept for next season. If they find a strong deal for either Civale or Quantrill, they might be dealt and Plesac kept for depth, but best guess is Bieber and Plesac are gone by opening day.

Rotation would be McKenzie, Quantrill, Civale, Bibee, L. Allen with Williams, Cantillo as depth plus who hangs around from the Gaddis/Curry/Battenfield group (Espino, Hankins and Burns need rostered). Morris is probably still around too, but won't get enough innings to be considered a rotation option
 
I think the weakest part of this organization is the OF. System-wide. Valera is injured again, but I still have hopes he can finish strong in AAA. OGonz is still a wildcard. Nobody else is even close.
Right now, our OF power compares to teams in the dead ball era.
Even if we have to overpay, this has to be solved - yesterday.
 
I think the weakest part of this organization is the OF. System-wide. Valera is injured again, but I still have hopes he can finish strong in AAA. OGonz is still a wildcard. Nobody else is even close.
Right now, our OF power compares to teams in the dead ball era.
Even if we have to overpay, this has to be solved - yesterday.

It is probably C - 1B - OF .... but I doubt the Guard FO will do anything beyond look for a few prospects when they trade for pitching. 1st base is just really Noel - Pries - Collado (who is in low A). Catcher is Naylor-Lava-Lopez/Mejia in low A. At least for OF - Palacios - Valera - Halpin - Lampe - Lipscomb and Altunez (in low A). Yet there are some guys that can stand out with DeLauter and Boyd being injured. And, we just promoted 3 last year that depleted the ranks unlike C/1B (Brennan, Oscar and Kwan).
 
Prospect wise..

The OF situation isn't void of talent with the likes of George Valera, Chase DeLauter, Johnkenzie Noel, Jacob Fox, Jaison Chourio, Isaiah Greene, Petey Halpin, Fredo Antunez and other / more recent IFA signings.. As far as readiness for ML action.. that would be a stretch for every prospect listed.. every damn one..save for Noel as a corner OF'er and Valera if he could EVER get healthy..

Catching remains thee most deficient and under populated prospect area of the Guardians and their system. It is a barren wasteland of wanna be's and hopefuls that don the tools of ignorance.. Lavas is not ready nor does it look like he'll EVER be ready to be a ML catcher.. He's the closest/best option in the current minor league system. We've watched as Zach Collins has had a great hitting season in the minors, however, Collins best position, defensively, is DH.. He's NOT a ML catcher, either.. Seeing him behind the plate would be a complete disaster.. Bo has a chance to be an everyday catcher.. more hit over defense right now (even though he is 0-10), but, with some guidance and maturity, he can achieve that goal.. He's not there yet.. The only exciting part of the catching in the system is found in the few IFA's that have been signed.. They're so far away, it's hard to believe they'd matter until 2026, at the earliest.. Victor Izturis, Jose Cedeno and Robert Lopez represent this group..
 
SP G. Stone
SP Frasso
LF/1B/Util M. Busch (T. Freeman with power)
C Y. Fernandez

That's 2 mid top 100 prospects (plug and play) ready for MLB (Stone/Busch), a performing mid rd college SP (Frasso, 24yo in AA) and a high end lotto ticket in C Fernandez (20yo in A+, strong track record)
You are moving the Gold Glove Kwan out of LF? I don't agree with that. If he plays 1B, what are you doing with Bell and Naylor (who does a good job at 1B)?
 
I think the weakest part of this organization is the OF. System-wide. Valera is injured again, but I still have hopes he can finish strong in AAA. OGonz is still a wildcard. Nobody else is even close.
Right now, our OF power compares to teams in the dead ball era.
Even if we have to overpay, this has to be solved - yesterday.

I'm with @petes999 catcher is the weakest position right now overall in the organization and its weakest overall by a Longshot hence why I keep trying to find more catching talent if possible via a trade...

The AAA group of OFs are okay, since it's been Palacios, Pries, Noel, OGonz and Valera (on paper) but sincerely after that we are barren until you get to Lampe, who we just drafted last season. Plus I wish we took a couple more gambles and drafted a few more power swings, which I hope via trade/draft we mix a few in.

1B is also a bit barren after the top couple guys, but I feel like they don't worry about that position as much as an organization. They rarely draft just a 1B and they have a tendency just to move the least athletic MIF prospects to 1B it feels like Iol
 
Honestly I figured I would reply to this here...

Cleveland, if they play their cards right, could on paper, have a very similar team talent wise if not better than they currently do by trading Bieber then trading for someone to replace Bieber in a sense. So Bieber gets the bat they need and the prospects we have gets someone to help replace Bieber in a sense and/or compliments this roster...

@Gson @CDAV45 @hockeyjohn @CATS44 humor me a moment and whoever else wants to do this I have a challenge... I will be doing it as well so don't worry

With 3 or less trades (you can say DFA so and so, that wont be considered a trade)... Let's say Antonetti makes Bieber available but still wishes for a wild card spot at least! He is willing to part with prospects as well to find upgrades in struggling positions...

At the end, Cleveland needs at least 3 SPs with 2+ years of MLB experience... design the trades within realistic reason (Aka BTV as a guiding point of reference if need be) and let's see what you come up with and we can discuss the trade ideas. We all won't agree but I think the middle ground could be interesting...
Baltimore has the need and has the most players that fill our needs. A package starting with Hays/Santander and Cowser/Kjerstad with Bradish since Cdav loves him so much.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top