Drummond and Thompson are as different as they can be. Drummond is the more elite physically. He is as long, tall, agile and strong as any modern center, with excellent movement from basket to basket.. He is a tough stop once he gets the ball low..
Thompson WS a hard hat undersized center, with a limited offensive skill set. He was often tasked with defending taller bigger centers and did pretty well just because he was strong and committed and unselfish..
The knock on Drummond has always been doubts about his commitment to play hard on both ends. A lot of turnovers in the paint from sloppy habits, and some egocentric decisions. Even before he was drafted there were doubts about his willingness to play..
At this point in he career Drummond can either continue to coast, where he trends toward ring chasing at vet min, or he can re-invent himself in the modern game and get paid big for another five years.. He has the talent to do the latter, but its a long shot he actually pulls it off.
The Cavs are in a win win situation with him.. He wins by transforming into a winning vector, playing hard defense and scoring down low for those stretches of the game where our scoring engines are resting, it where matchups favor us. If he does that he commands an excellent contract, which the Cavs can trade for more than they gave up to get him..
The Cavs get to experiment with a genuine big, which they have not had since Moz.. in combination with thier young back court.. a Drummond / Garland PNR should be unstoppable...
I think this year informs the FO in regards to where to draft bigs and how to value thier skillets in the modern NBA..