foucault87
All-Star
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 7,326
- Reaction score
- 9,727
- Points
- 113
4/80 is the most I am willing to go with Allen. Pay him for what he has shown and a little wiggle room for what he may be able to do soon. I like him a lot and I think we can get him for that, but at this point he is a tier 4, maybe low tier 3 center. And I don't view his upside beyond a mid-high tier 3 guy (~ 10th best center in the league). The thing is, if you can get similar production from a guy near the vet min (WCS, Noel, Dwight for example), it is not worth it to splooge on JA. The center position has been devalued a lot in recent years and when we are a playoff team, Allen will probably be watching the closing of some games from the bench.
He might be the best C since 07 big Z, but I don't really care if he asks for too much money, SnT or let him walk. Now, if we get Mobley, I think our need to sign Allen increases a lot. Mobley is too small to bang full time rn. I mean even Bam and AD play the 4 til its go time. A Mobley/Allen front court is terrfying defensively and we can go "small" with Mobley the way the Lakers go small with AD, a 7 foot switchable rim protector on D who plays like a wing on the other end. Devastating. And if we decide to go large, we would have not one, not two, but three really long shot blockers in the front court. Sick.
He might be the best C since 07 big Z, but I don't really care if he asks for too much money, SnT or let him walk. Now, if we get Mobley, I think our need to sign Allen increases a lot. Mobley is too small to bang full time rn. I mean even Bam and AD play the 4 til its go time. A Mobley/Allen front court is terrfying defensively and we can go "small" with Mobley the way the Lakers go small with AD, a 7 foot switchable rim protector on D who plays like a wing on the other end. Devastating. And if we decide to go large, we would have not one, not two, but three really long shot blockers in the front court. Sick.